-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add definitions and profiles to ZYYX+, ZYYX Pro and ZYYX Pro ii #18374
Add definitions and profiles to ZYYX+, ZYYX Pro and ZYYX Pro ii #18374
Conversation
Note: this PR references some materials not yet implemented in Cura. These materials are currently awating approval in PR#281 in Ultimaker/fdm_materials. |
Or we could just leave it in 🤷 |
Ok, looks like they just made a test with Cura, that ended up in the mainstream for weak reasons. I'm good with removing it then. If people somehow get to complain about this, they can still restore the files on their installation, and we shall put it back, but that is extremely unlikely. |
Error Files:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I spotted one issue with setting_version, and a possible optimization for variants. Otherwise looks very good !
@wawanbreton Versions updated and line_width removed! |
Nice, thanks ! I just saw that some variants defined a line_width different from the machine_nozzle_size tough, those should probably be restored ? Also there are some conflicts with main, because we just upgraded the settings_version to 24 (didn't think we would merge it that fast 😀) so you can ignore the conflicts and force your files removals. |
It appears I accidentally put weird values for line_width for the 0.8mm (and 0.2mm) nozzle. I believe the default should perform better. Should I bump the settings version to 24? |
As you are on it, you can. Otherwise we plan to make an other pass for it. |
I have not checked v.24 compatibility, maybe I/we could do it in the future. |
changes between 23 and 24 are really self-contained and don't concern your settings at all, so you can safely put either 23 or 24 |
Then 23 is ok by me. |
Hi @theodorhansson, can you just fix the git conflicts ? After that I guess we can merge this PR |
# Conflicts: # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_global_fast.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_global_fine.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_global_normal.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_pro_flex_fast.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_pro_flex_fine.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_pro_flex_normal.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_pro_pla_fast.inst.cfg # resources/quality/zyyx/zyyx_agile_pro_pla_fine.inst.cfg
Error Files:
|
@wawanbreton I merged the branches (and updated to v24...). |
Very nice, thanks ! I can now approve and it will be merged after further testing. |
Error Files:
|
Hi @theodorhansson, we just realized that the profiles contain a flow ratio of 420, which is totally outside usual specs. Is this on purpose, or possibly a mistake ? |
Hi @wawanbreton! It is on purpose. The extruder was changed by the manufacturer, but the firmware was not. I believe it was a geared Bondtech, but I'm not 100%. Unfortunately I have not personally printed with a ZYYX Pro II. |
I looked again at the Simplify3D profiles from the manufacturer and they also contain an abnormally large extrusion multiplier. |
Ok, thanks for your quick answer 🙂 |
Description
This adds three printers that were previously missing from Cura.
This also changes the manufacturer of the following printer. Which was previously made by Magicfirm Europe, but the firm was rebranded to ZYYX Labs AB.
Type of change
Implements
How Has This Been Tested?
Testprints have been performed on all ZYYX printers except ZYYX Agile.
Test Configuration:
Checklist: