You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Measuring prediction error separately would allow to benchmark how travel and dwell times contribute to prediction errors. This benchmarking could inform the prioritization of new development efforts. The benchmarking could also assess the performance of prediction methods and help identify bugs. Recording prediction errors for constituent parts separately is therefore necessary to guide the development of prediction methods addressing dwell time and travel time specifically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on the new data fields developed by @scrudden, we are now able to record prediction errors for travel and dwell times separately. The following graph shows 12.5 to 87.7 percentiles of dwell and travel prediction errors against the horizon on the MBTA's Route 66 in Boston. We can see that dwell time predictions tend to be overly optimistic whereas travel time predictions are pessimistic. They cancel each other out. This shows the value of considering travel and dwell time predictions separately.
Measuring prediction error separately would allow to benchmark how travel and dwell times contribute to prediction errors. This benchmarking could inform the prioritization of new development efforts. The benchmarking could also assess the performance of prediction methods and help identify bugs. Recording prediction errors for constituent parts separately is therefore necessary to guide the development of prediction methods addressing dwell time and travel time specifically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: