You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am finishing revising a paper where I use QuasiMonteCarlo.jl.
I read about how to cite Julia packages (here).
What is the common practice for SciML packages (guess answer is here)?
As there are no paper yet, can something that work?
Yeah something like that would work for now. I think down the line we may want to go for a JOSS paper. I don't think we have enough to mathematically say to go for a full 20 pager, but there is merit here to JOSS.
I am finishing revising a paper where I use
QuasiMonteCarlo.jl
.I read about how to cite Julia packages (here).
What is the common practice for SciML packages (guess answer is here)?
As there are no paper yet, can something that work?
BTW, any paper plans? Since 1/4 of the code comes from various packages (Sobol, Lattice, Latin, I am not sure if this is a legit idea or not,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: