Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tagged releases #53

Open
elfgoh opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Tagged releases #53

elfgoh opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@elfgoh
Copy link

elfgoh commented Mar 28, 2017

(I realised that this issue may not be the right place but I am at a loss where else to start so here goes) I wonder if tagged releases would be a good idea.

The context of this question, I am using console images eg version A[1]. Occasionally a new stable build is updated at [1] eg version B. Is there any visibility as to which additional commits of boot-scripts go into the new stable build?

The use case is: I do not want to keep changing the console image that I use for customisation, ie keep chasing the latest stable build. So I may want to selectively pull commits to version A.

So ideally, I want a LTS console image, with the option to pull in commits for boot-scripts that are stable fixes via git.

[1] http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#Jessie_Snapshot_console

@RobertCNelson
Copy link
Owner

Not really, most of the time this repo should be safe to just pull. However with the whole interface rewrite usb0/usb1 so that we no longer need drivers on windows/mac, things kind of became interesting.

Regards,

@elfgoh
Copy link
Author

elfgoh commented Mar 29, 2017

So does that mean that this repo is no longer safe to just pull?

This next part is kinda off topic but

  • if any, what are the other git repos present in the image?
  • if any, are those other git repos safe to pull most of the time?

@RobertCNelson
Copy link
Owner

The change over to dual interfaces happened on March 9th.. So if you are running an image after March 9th, it's safe to pull.. Before March 9th, you just need to make sure you are running a newer kernel (released around march 9th)..

this is the only used repo that is not packaged.

regards,

@elfgoh
Copy link
Author

elfgoh commented Mar 29, 2017

Thanks for the information. I am glad that I filed this issue. I had originally intended to use a feb console image. I am under the impression that if I didnt file the image, it would have been difficult to know of similar information that you mentioned.

May I know what are the mechanisms to be informed of such issues when I wish to pull the bootscripts repo?

@elfgoh
Copy link
Author

elfgoh commented Mar 31, 2017

May I know which are the other packaged repos?

@RobertCNelson
Copy link
Owner

@elfgoh the usb0/usb1 had been the first major change to the boot-scripts startup since we implemented it..

Here's the full list of git repo's we pull in, some need to be packaged, some don't 'need it'..

https://github.com/RobertCNelson/omap-image-builder/blob/master/target/chroot/beagleboard.org-jessie.sh#L208-L324

ps, if "git" isn't installed, these aren't pulled in..

Regards,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants