Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make auto-evo take slime jets into account (more) #4128

Open
hhyyrylainen opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #5777
Open

Make auto-evo take slime jets into account (more) #4128

hhyyrylainen opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #5777

Comments

@hhyyrylainen
Copy link
Member

I just checked and it seems like auto-evo has no clue whatsoever that slime jets exist. Would be nice if they had some impact for example related to predation.

@Oliveriver
Copy link
Contributor

This isn’t entirely correct, as Auto-Evo does use amount of mucilage produced as a parameter in its predation calculations, and mucilage production is directly tied to number of jets. But it would be much better to have overall jet speed feed into both prey and predator calculations, which I couldn’t work out how to do.

@hhyyrylainen
Copy link
Member Author

Ah yes, of course, I forgot to search for "mucilage" in auto-evo. So this is kind of done. I'll let someone else edit the title / description or open a new issue if there's someone who wants to tackle this in auto-evo.

@hhyyrylainen hhyyrylainen changed the title Make auto-evo take slime jets into account Make auto-evo take slime jets into account (more) Feb 14, 2023
@hhyyrylainen hhyyrylainen moved this to Done in Thrive Planning Aug 7, 2024
@hhyyrylainen
Copy link
Member Author

Reopening this due to: #5776

@hhyyrylainen hhyyrylainen reopened this Jan 7, 2025
@hhyyrylainen hhyyrylainen added this to the Release 0.8.1 milestone Jan 7, 2025
@Patryk26g Patryk26g linked a pull request Jan 7, 2025 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants