Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Book 2.4.6, "standard" projection #1635

Open
whydoubt opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Book 2.4.6, "standard" projection #1635

whydoubt opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@whydoubt
Copy link
Contributor

whydoubt commented Sep 2, 2024

Having worked with geographic projections extensively, I would not say there is such thing as a "standard" projection. There are several popular projections suited for various needs (and plenty more less popular ones). As for the type of projection that matches the mapping equations used in this section, any image using an "equirectangular" projection would work.

@hollasch hollasch self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
@hollasch
Copy link
Collaborator

Rectangular is probably sufficient. We just need continental blobs somewhere as we're just looking for something pretty. Actually, there's no need for users to go grab anything, as we include images/earthmap.jpg in the project already.

Might just add a suggestion to play with other rectangular image sources for fun. I'll reword a bit.

@whydoubt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mercator is another common rectangular projection, but it is not equirectangular. Same with Gall-Peters, though much less common. You would need to use different formulas to render those correctly.

I do like idea of suggesting trying other sources, as maybe it could give someone more of an appreciation of projections and texture mapping in general.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants