You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for your interesting tool. I am having problems of the following kind:
When I load a 1GB image stack (TIF, resolution ~ 0.2x0.2x0.5 microns) and its corresponding masks (also 1GB TIF), the process is quite memory hungry (speaking of > 100GB) and loading takes hours. Also, when the loading process is eventually over, any interaction with the GUI make it unresponsive and memory consumption increases further w/o converging (I had to terminate when >400GB). So I suppose this tool is rather intended for smaller tissue patches with low double-digit lengths (in microns), or did I overlook something with respect to the input data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have the same issue. There are other programs that successfully load these image sizes (e.g. vispy/napari) without these memory issues, so optimization is certainly possible (but might be too much work to implement here).
Hi,
thanks for your interesting tool. I am having problems of the following kind:
When I load a 1GB image stack (TIF, resolution ~ 0.2x0.2x0.5 microns) and its corresponding masks (also 1GB TIF), the process is quite memory hungry (speaking of > 100GB) and loading takes hours. Also, when the loading process is eventually over, any interaction with the GUI make it unresponsive and memory consumption increases further w/o converging (I had to terminate when >400GB). So I suppose this tool is rather intended for smaller tissue patches with low double-digit lengths (in microns), or did I overlook something with respect to the input data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: