Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Transition and state objects should probably not be dictionaries #115

Open
mcdonc opened this issue Aug 31, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Transition and state objects should probably not be dictionaries #115

mcdonc opened this issue Aug 31, 2013 · 2 comments
Milestone
Alpha 2

Comments

@mcdonc
Copy link
Member

mcdonc commented Aug 31, 2013

Currently they are (in the workflow package). They should probably instead be persistent objects in their own right.
@cguardia
Copy link
Member

cguardia commented Oct 6, 2013

What are you looking for here? Just use a persistent mapping or full fledged transition objects with some sort of interface?

@mcdonc
Copy link
Member Author

mcdonc commented Oct 6, 2013

I think the latter.

@cguardia cguardia modified the milestones: After First Release, Alpha 2 May 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Alpha 2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mcdonc @cguardia