Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate or Add Support for a More Comprehensive Code Formatter #2

Open
Programmer-RD-AI opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Programmer-RD-AI
Copy link
Owner

It would be fantastic to improve the formatting capabilities in this configuration by integrating or supporting a more advanced code formatter, similar to [conform.nvim](https://github.com/stevearc/conform.nvim).

A high-quality formatter would provide:

  • Seamless, language-specific formatting.
  • Customizable configurations per project or filetype.
  • Minimal setup with built-in support for popular formatters like prettier, black, clang-format, etc.

Why This Feature Is Needed:

  • Current formatting options might lack flexibility or fail to meet modern coding standards across various languages.
  • An advanced formatter would enhance developer productivity by ensuring code consistency and reducing manual formatting efforts.

Suggested Features:

  1. Support for on-save formatting.
  2. Easy-to-configure formatters for different languages.
  3. Non-blocking and async formatting for better performance.
  4. Compatibility with existing tools like LSPs or external formatters.

References:

This enhancement would take the configuration to the next level. Thank you for considering this suggestion! 🚀

@Programmer-RD-AI Programmer-RD-AI self-assigned this Dec 13, 2024
Copy link

@Programmer-RD-AI Programmer-RD-AI added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant