Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate ReportStatusBuffer use in DetailedStatus Packet #206

Open
1 task
zCoCo opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

Investigate ReportStatusBuffer use in DetailedStatus Packet #206

zCoCo opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working bug-min Likely inconsequential that shouldn't affect any aspect of mission, even nominal ones. Unit Testing Something needs unit tests WD Code changes to the WatchDog
Milestone

Comments

@zCoCo
Copy link
Member

zCoCo commented Mar 1, 2023

This buffer isn't what's being txDownlinked so it's weird that's it's even there. That said, DetailedStatus downlink works, so super low priority. Not worth messing with really, except perhaps as part of #201 .

  • Thoroughly re-test all DetailedStatus downlink fields before merging if any changes were made to how it's packed.
@zCoCo zCoCo added Unit Testing Something needs unit tests WD Code changes to the WatchDog bug-min Likely inconsequential that shouldn't affect any aspect of mission, even nominal ones. labels Mar 1, 2023
@zCoCo zCoCo added this to the RC9 milestone Mar 1, 2023
@zCoCo zCoCo self-assigned this Mar 1, 2023
@zCoCo zCoCo added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working bug-min Likely inconsequential that shouldn't affect any aspect of mission, even nominal ones. Unit Testing Something needs unit tests WD Code changes to the WatchDog
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant