You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I feel like we once had a discussion about why the native plot function uses .step() instead of .plot(), but I can't remember the reasoning for it anymore. Was wondering if we could add a keyword so users can choose to use .plot instead of .step in the plotting function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's mostly preference. Step emphasizes the pixel-based quantization of spectra, which I think is useful. My weak preference would be not to add an an option for .plot(), but I am open to it. In general my guidance on updates to plots would be to mimic---almost verbatim---the way that lightkurve does plotting:
I feel like we once had a discussion about why the native plot function uses .step() instead of .plot(), but I can't remember the reasoning for it anymore. Was wondering if we could add a keyword so users can choose to use .plot instead of .step in the plotting function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: