-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A way to verify everyone who is running OpenHack events has access to this repo #59
Comments
I like the idea of an OpenHack sub, but I'm curious what sorts of commands would be there. Would it be primarily for managing the committers? It might also be a good idea to include a |
If the suggested sub was intended to manage committers, does it make sense to try to add access management functionality to hub, since the framework for conversing with the GH API is already built in that project? Perhaps then it would be relatively simple to build an OpenHack-specific tool by piggybacking on hub. As an aside, I agree it would be helpful to have basic contributor guidelines specified somewhere. Seems like it might be useful to open a separate issue for discussing that if discussion is warranted. |
Bumping this, we need a better way for this to happen. We shouldnt have to merge PRs to allow dates to update. Maybe everyone should have push, pull, admin rights on this repo? |
When Miami got added, I also got added into a Miami team in the OpenHack org that has push/pull permissions. Is there a way to automate that? |
I'm not sure if this issue is about how to give those who run OpenHack events access to this repo, or how to verify those people before adding them to the trusted group. Based on #59 (comment), I assume there are teams (with push permissions) within the organization to add trusted organizers to. So the issue would be how do you conveniently verify these people before adding them to the appropriate team. Is this step being done manually, and if so, is it too difficult or time consuming? |
There is no way of automating this right now and sadly github teams aren't On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dennis Ideler [email protected]
|
So we have a problem:
People running OpenHack can't always update the website. I don't want to have to manually approve each copy/edit change (and no one really should have to) once a city has been merged in.
I think we should have a separate repo to fix this that can:
Maybe we can have an OpenHack sub? https://github.com/37signals/sub
Any other thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: