You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2022. It is now read-only.
This workflow takes variability in available crystal structures into account. HSP90 was part of the D3R 2015 Grand Challenge. There are a large number of crystal structures available on the PDB. This workflow has the challenge to on top of coming up with a reasonable binding pose to also select a pdb structure. The idea is to cluster available PDBs, e.g. using RMSD and spectral clusters to then find representative structures in each cluster center and use these as a basis for docking. Then each compound in smiles.txt is docked to all selected protein clusters, ideally from then on following the use case description of issue #5.
Attached are the pdb structures with an example ligand docked using rDock and the top scoring pose. For maximal usefulness a set of inputrcd and prmtop files should be generated rather than just the pdb structures. The ligand should then be paramatrised using a default protocol, e.g AM1-BCC charges including an automated forcefield selection for the protein followed by solvation in a water box specifying a given water model. All this while taking care of protonation states and appropriate neutralisation using counter ions.
Attachment
Input:
HSP90.txt
smiles.txt
Output:
[PDB1-4]-HSP90_40-1.pdb[inpcrd/prmtop]
Setup description
This workflow takes variability in available crystal structures into account. HSP90 was part of the D3R 2015 Grand Challenge. There are a large number of crystal structures available on the PDB. This workflow has the challenge to on top of coming up with a reasonable binding pose to also select a pdb structure. The idea is to cluster available PDBs, e.g. using RMSD and spectral clusters to then find representative structures in each cluster center and use these as a basis for docking. Then each compound in smiles.txt is docked to all selected protein clusters, ideally from then on following the use case description of issue #5.
Attached are the pdb structures with an example ligand docked using rDock and the top scoring pose. For maximal usefulness a set of inputrcd and prmtop files should be generated rather than just the pdb structures. The ligand should then be paramatrised using a default protocol, e.g AM1-BCC charges including an automated forcefield selection for the protein followed by solvation in a water box specifying a given water model. All this while taking care of protonation states and appropriate neutralisation using counter ions.
usecase#6.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: