You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of the Beacon Node Health Status logic in Charon does not consider the number of connected peers. As a result, a Beacon Node with zero peers is still reported as having a "Health Status" of OK, which may not reflect the operational status of the node.
Resources
This cluster has a Health Status OK despite zero peers in BN (which is supposed to be a health status).
Per the docs for the /readyz endpoint (which is used for the Health Status gauge)
"Set to 1 if the node is operational and monitoring api /readyz endpoint is returning 200s. "
"Else /readyz is returning 500s and this metric is either set to "
"2 if the beacon node is down, or"
"3 if the beacon node is syncing, or"
"4 if quorum peers are not connected."
🛠️ Proposed solution
Implement a check for the minimum required number (at least 3) of connected peers
Update the Health Status logic to consider a Beacon Node with zero peers as unhealthy
Determine the appropriate Health Status value or error code for a Beacon Node with zero peers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🎯 Problem to be solved
The current implementation of the Beacon Node Health Status logic in Charon does not consider the number of connected peers. As a result, a Beacon Node with zero peers is still reported as having a "Health Status" of OK, which may not reflect the operational status of the node.
Resources
This cluster has a Health Status OK despite zero peers in BN (which is supposed to be a health status).
Per the docs for the
/readyz
endpoint (which is used for the Health Status gauge)🛠️ Proposed solution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: