You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If this is a question, something isn't working or an idea please start a Q&A discussion in the Discussion tab
Open a bug report only if you can provide the details below
Describe the bug
service_models/reserves.jl line#469, startup_time = PSY.get_time_limits(d).up.
The PSY.get_time_limits(d).up seem to give the minimum up time, and the startup time should be a different parameter?
To Reproduce
service_models/reserves.jl line#469, startup_time = PSY.get_time_limits(d).up.
Expected behavior
startup time would be a individual parameter.
If this startup time is considered, this parameter seem to drive the unit commitment problem as well. If the commitment is made at t, the unit will be on at t+startup time
Screenshots
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If this is a question, something isn't working or an idea please start a Q&A discussion in the Discussion tab
Open a bug report only if you can provide the details below
Describe the bug
service_models/reserves.jl line#469, startup_time = PSY.get_time_limits(d).up.
The PSY.get_time_limits(d).up seem to give the minimum up time, and the startup time should be a different parameter?
To Reproduce
service_models/reserves.jl line#469, startup_time = PSY.get_time_limits(d).up.
Expected behavior
startup time would be a individual parameter.
If this startup time is considered, this parameter seem to drive the unit commitment problem as well. If the commitment is made at t, the unit will be on at t+startup time
Screenshots
![image_720](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/25492746/385090685-9847ca2e-defd-4657-87e7-48153c3e5e7a.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.rO6N5Whc1_g8JbSCc0o0hbjtrtr-nNTxjctEEZgWGEM)
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: