You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When performing global forcing calculation using ERA5 2014 as an input, the forcing of CH4 is higher the value reported to Pincus et al., 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001621) (using also GRTcode), and the forcing of CFCs is lower than Pincus et al., 2019.
CH4 concentration has been confirmed to be the same, although CFC concentration may have some difference. It is recommended to re-use the 100 column experiment to reproduce IRF values as reported to Pincus et al., 2019.
If IRF of 100 column experiment can be reproduced, other possible reason could be vertical or temporal resolution of input ERA5 profiles
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When performing global forcing calculation using ERA5 2014 as an input, the forcing of CH4 is higher the value reported to Pincus et al., 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001621) (using also GRTcode), and the forcing of CFCs is lower than Pincus et al., 2019.
CH4 concentration has been confirmed to be the same, although CFC concentration may have some difference. It is recommended to re-use the 100 column experiment to reproduce IRF values as reported to Pincus et al., 2019.
If IRF of 100 column experiment can be reproduced, other possible reason could be vertical or temporal resolution of input ERA5 profiles
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: