Update sorc/gsi_enkf.fd hash

[RussTreadon-NOAA]

What new functionality do you need?

g-w develop currently points at gsi_enkf.fd @ 9f44c87. This is an older hash of NOAA-EMC/GSI develop.

Missing in the current g-w sorc/gsi_enkf.fd hash is GSI PR #790. This PR corrects a bug in IASI code so that gsi.x can successfully run to completion in debug mode. NCO pre-implementation testing requires executables to successfully run in debug mode.

This issue is opened to note the need to update and, as appropriate, keep updating the sorc/gsi_enkf.fd hash for GFS v17 (and possibly GFS v16.4)

What are the requirements for the new functionality?

Keep sorc/gsi_enkf.fd up to date with the NOAA-EMC/GSI hash required by GFS v16.4 and/or GFS v17.

Acceptance Criteria

• gsi.x and enkf.x successfully run to completion after updating sorc/gsi_enkf.fd hash

Suggest a solution (optional)

No response

[RussTreadon-NOAA]

@CatherineThomas-NOAA and @ADCollard : Two questions

1. When should we update the gsi_enkf.fd hash in g-w?
2. To which GSI hash do we update gsi_enkf.fd?

[CatherineThomas-NOAA]

@RussTreadon-NOAA:
For v17, a g-w PR is being prepared for the soil DA that will update the GSI hash. I'm not aware of any reason not to update to the head of develop, are you?

[RussTreadon-NOAA]

@CatherineThomas-NOAA , my preference is to keep DA g-w hashes as close as possible (and practical) to the head of their respective develop. Updating sorc/gsi_enkf.fd to 27c03e8 works for me.

I see some GSI issues (e.g., #783 , #809) which we probably want in g-w. These issues do not, at present, have corresponding PRs.

[RussTreadon-NOAA]

Work for this issue will be done in RussTreadon-NOAA:feature/update_gsi_enkf

[RussTreadon-NOAA]

g-w develop versions/fix.ver currently sets gsi_ver=20240208. In constrast, the modulefiles in the updated gsi_enkf.fd reference gsi/20241022. gsi_ver should be updated to be consistent with the newer gsi_enkf.fd hash.

[CatherineThomas-NOAA]

gsi_ver should be updated to be consistent with the newer gsi_enkf.fd hash.

Thanks @RussTreadon-NOAA. @ClaraDraper-NOAA: see Russ's comment above.