Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example data for advanced workflow #92

Open
tischi opened this issue Jan 24, 2021 · 15 comments
Open

Example data for advanced workflow #92

tischi opened this issue Jan 24, 2021 · 15 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator

tischi commented Jan 24, 2021

@ssgpers @manerotoni @seadaisy

Do you happen have example images, which are:

  • 2D
  • There is a treatment and a control image with a clear difference in the number and/or shape of objects
  • One needs to apply a simple denoising (e.g. median filter) for the binarization to work.

Along the lines of something like this (ideally with a bit more objects and ideally some published data).
image

@tischi tischi added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 24, 2021
@manerotoni
Copy link
Collaborator

manerotoni commented Jan 24, 2021

What is the problem with this image? Apart that it has only 2 objects. I don't think this kind of data must come from a publication.

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 24, 2021

What is the problem with this image? Apart that it has only 2 objects. I don't think this kind of data must come from a publication.

That's the example image that I use in the module to explain, e.g., a median filter.
I thought for the workflow we might like to have something else.

@tischi tischi changed the title Example data for denoising Example data for advanced workflow Jan 24, 2021
@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 24, 2021

I think for the advanced workflow also something where we need a bit of object filtering, right?

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 24, 2021

It is incredible how much time it takes to find good example data with just the problem that you want ;-)
I ended up "manufacturing" two images, by cropping and adding some noise to raw data that we acquired during a course.

The task would be to develop a workflow that automatically measures that the nuclei on the left are bigger than on the right.

image

@manerotoni
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry I misunderstood the first question. I thought you wanted an additional image for just median filter explanation.
For the workflow shape measurement with filters this looks good. I realized that I have also more examples with PLK1 inhibition. I guess I also have to add some noise :-( .
In principlesite does not harm to provide several workflow example images.
The PLK1 difference is in the morphology and can be quite nicely shown with circularity.

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 25, 2021

In principle site does not harm to provide several workflow example images.

Yes, please go ahead and add more!

@seadaisy
Copy link

Hi both,
If needed, we have a plate with fixed cells with PLK1 and KIF11 phenotypes (cells have a nuclear marker and labeled tubulin). I could take images in the condition you need for your teaching.
All the best
Sabine

@manerotoni
Copy link
Collaborator

@tischi, and @seadaisy,
I uploaded PLK1 example images (xy_8bit__nuclei_PLK1_control, + inhibition). I think they are noisy enough that a simple threshold gives a rough boundary so either one needs raw image filtering or binary operations to clean up.

If @seadaisy wants to acquire some additional data it could be nice. For instance the KiF11 one could also look at the tubulin phenotype (intensity values). In principle one would need a 2D image (quite small 500-600 pixels) with not too many nuclei so that we can easily separate them. One can acquire images at different quality (one rather low but still visible and a good image in both channels). For an LSM for instance by reducing the line-averaging, laser-power, or detector gain.
Thanks

Antonio

@manerotoni
Copy link
Collaborator

image

@seadaisy
Copy link

f @seadaisy wants to acquire some additional data it could be nice. For instance the KiF11 one could also look at the tubulin phenotype (intensity values). In principle one would need a 2D image (quite small 500-600 pixels) with not too many nuclei so that we can easily separate them. One can acquire images at different quality (one rather low but still visible and a good image in both channels). For an LSM for instance by reducing the line-averaging, laser-power, or detector gain.
Thanks

Does it has to be a confocal image? If not, I can do it on a wide- field (very low light intensity should work).
Sabine

@manerotoni
Copy link
Collaborator

Wide field is fine. They tend to be quite less noisy.

@seadaisy
Copy link

Dear All,
unfortunately the plate I was talking about is not suitable anymore :(
When ever we will have such a plate again, I will come back to you.
Nonetheless I took images were always a pro-, or pro-meta-phase is in a field of view together with inter-phase nuclei with high and low exposure time (tubulin GFP and H2B mcherry) if this would be helpful, I could share the images.
best
Sabine

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 26, 2021

@imagejan @ssgpers @manerotoni @seadaisy
What would be super nice if someone had images like the ones below but in 3D!
image

@seadaisy
Copy link

Shouldn't we maybe collect a "wish list" which data /datasets are needed and try to acquire them? We could then even store them, were the community has access to this data.
It needs a bit of planning, but we have the microscopes, I could prepare the samples...
What do you think?

Sabine

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Jan 26, 2021

Shouldn't we maybe collect a "wish list" which data /datasets are needed and try to acquire them? We could then even store them, were the community has access to this data.
It needs a bit of planning, but we have the microscopes, I could prepare the samples...
What do you think?

❤️
Amazing! Thank you so much for offering this!
I think @manerotoni also would have a chance to contribute.
I started a google doc for this:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AkP1Vok5SOcj-eKAR397kpN2XlXXAAjBas8Odoke57I/edit?usp=sharing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants