You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've examined the configuration files for the flood and burn scars data, and I have two questions:
Both the flood and burn scars data have means and standard deviations included in their respective configuration files. I've noticed that they use the same band combinations, but the means and standard deviations differ. Could you please explain the reason for this differences?
During fine-tuning, the flood and burn scars data utilized different decoder heads. I'm curious about the rationale behind this difference.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I've examined the configuration files for the flood and burn scars data, and I have two questions:
Both the flood and burn scars data have means and standard deviations included in their respective configuration files. I've noticed that they use the same band combinations, but the means and standard deviations differ. Could you please explain the reason for this differences?
During fine-tuning, the flood and burn scars data utilized different decoder heads. I'm curious about the rationale behind this difference.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: