Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle diagnostics that fail #327

Closed
jfrost-mo opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1039
Closed

Handle diagnostics that fail #327

jfrost-mo opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1039
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member

jfrost-mo commented Dec 11, 2023

The entire workflow shouldn't crash if you are just missing a variable used by a single diagnostic. It should exit cleanly, and report the status on the CSET front page.

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 11, 2023
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2023
6 tasks
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added this to the Major usability blockers milestone Oct 25, 2024
@jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member Author

I have mixed feelings on this one, as having the workflow hold if a task fails is very useful for debugging. It may be something we want to make dependent of whether debugging logging is enabled.

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
jfrost-mo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
jfrost-mo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
jfrost-mo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
jfrost-mo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
jfrost-mo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant