Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Campaign Option To Use Lowest Skilled Admin When Ordering Parts #212

Open
BLOODWOLF333 opened this issue Oct 26, 2016 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations

Comments

@BLOODWOLF333
Copy link
Contributor

Currently HQ always uses your highest skilled admin to order parts first before moving on to the next highest skilled. Asking for an option to set an order of precedence for what personnel to use first when ordering parts.

Use lowest skilled first <what I need
Use highest skilled first
[any other combinations we can come up with?]

I treat my unit's motor/mech-pool like a platoon with a platoon commander (2Lt with scrounge as the skill to acquire parts) and then all the techs as enlisted. So when that 2LT gets to CPT and moves to the battalion motor-pool I dont need them ordering parts for the lance anymore since I have a new butterbar come in but, then he never gets any xp. Would also be nice to assign an admin to each force and that admin would order parts for that force first before going to the Captain or the next admin. Kind like how techs are done with the units having an assigned tech to each unit.

@Dylan-M Dylan-M added the (RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations label Oct 30, 2016
@Dylan-M Dylan-M added this to the Post-Stable 0.42 milestone Oct 30, 2016
@Dylan-M
Copy link
Contributor

Dylan-M commented Oct 30, 2016

Better would be to do what we do for refits: dialog showing available personnel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(RFE) Enhancement Requests for Enhancement, new features or implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants