You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In attempting to test intentionally preforming an accidental fall from above, I noticed that the damage dealt to the target of the fall did not match the Total Warfare or the BMM damage formula. (page 57 BMM, matches the rule in TW)
The damage from the building collapsing to both units and the fall damage to the "attacker" are all correct, but the listed collision damage to the target wraith seems to stop at the pilot hit.
Uncertain if this is considered a "Major" or "Minor" feature, I'm leaning towards this being a major feature due to the rule being located within PSR rules.
3. Steps to Reproduce
On the Desert airbase number 2 map, have two >40ton mechs capable of 4+ jump. (we used wraith TR1s with 4/4 pilots)
The unit that lost Initiative walks/runs into a building on level 0 (in the test, We used hex 0903)
The unit that won Initiative then jumps onto the roof of the building, triggering an immediate collapse.
Brief Description *
In attempting to test intentionally preforming an accidental fall from above, I noticed that the damage dealt to the target of the fall did not match the Total Warfare or the BMM damage formula. (page 57 BMM, matches the rule in TW)
The damage from the building collapsing to both units and the fall damage to the "attacker" are all correct, but the listed collision damage to the target wraith seems to stop at the pilot hit.
Uncertain if this is considered a "Major" or "Minor" feature, I'm leaning towards this being a major feature due to the rule being located within PSR rules.
3. Steps to Reproduce
Attach Files
logs.zip
Severity *
High (Major Disruption): A major feature is broken or incorrect, but a workaround exists.
MegaMek Suite Version *
0.50.1
Operating System *
Platform: Windows 10 10.0 (amd64)
Java Version *
Java Vendor: Oracle Corporation Java Version: 17.0.9
Final Verification
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: