Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] LAMs only display generic AirMech sprites #6380

Open
4 tasks done
jimtheviking opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks done

[Issue] LAMs only display generic AirMech sprites #6380

jimtheviking opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@jimtheviking
Copy link

Brief Description *

Like it says on the tin; regardless of chassis or model, the LAM sprites for AirMech mode are all the default airmech found in \data\images\units\defaults. This happens regardless of the information in mekset.txt, localserver_mekset.txt, or localclient_mekset.txt

I've included screenshots of LAM chassis using the default airmech sprite and my localclient_mekset.txt file showing the files they should be using.

3. Steps to Reproduce

  1. In MegaMek, select a LAM unit for your force
  2. Right click the LAM and go to customize
  3. Under the "deployment" tab, select "AirMek" and, regardless of chassis, model, or settings in mekset files, the sprite used will be the default LAM Airmech sprite found under \data\images\units\defaults.

Attach Files

{E5655628-39E5-4053-9AE6-080EE221677E}
localclient_mekset.txt

Severity *

Low (Minor/Nuisance): Minor glitches or cosmetic issues that don't affect gameplay and occur rarely.

MegaMek Suite Version *

50.0.2

Operating System *

Windows 11 10.0

Java Version *

Eclipse Adoptium 17.0.13

Final Verification

  • I confirm this is a single, unique issue that hasn't been reported before
  • I have included all necessary information and files to help reproduce this issue
  • I have asked on MegaMek Discord about this issue
  • I have confirmed this issue is being opened on the correct repository: MegaMek, MegaMekLab, or MekHQ
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant