You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2021. It is now read-only.
Most other proposals include a section for requests to LC. Should this section be included in the bib citations proposals? LC would probably reject the use of annotations, but it might be worth requesting creation of a Citation class, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IMO yes, we should request the Citation class and any associated terms.
From: Tim Thompson <[email protected]>
Reply-To: LD4P/ArtFrame-RareMat <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, August 28, 2017 at 10:07 AM
To: LD4P/ArtFrame-RareMat <[email protected]>
Cc: Subscribed <[email protected]>
Subject: [LD4P/ArtFrame-RareMat] Requests to LC for bib citations? (#7)
Most other proposals include a section with requests to LC. Should this section be included in the bib citations proposals? LC would probably reject the use of annotations, but it might be worth requesting creation of a Citation class, etc.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABnX5I1b9fFKmItx_RutJaN6cX6euPSjks5scsmfgaJpZM4PEkOX>.
I'll go thru the various docs already published this week and compile into a manageable fashion -- then send to LC. Would you want to add a formal section to the bibCit rec, @timathom ? If not, I can add this as part of the compiling process.
Most other proposals include a section for requests to LC. Should this section be included in the bib citations proposals? LC would probably reject the use of annotations, but it might be worth requesting creation of a Citation class, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: