Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement groups of species to enable primitive rules #33

Open
jonrkarr opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Implement groups of species to enable primitive rules #33

jonrkarr opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@jonrkarr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jonrkarr jonrkarr changed the title Implement groups Implement groups of species to enable primitive rules Nov 15, 2018
@jonrkarr
Copy link
Member Author

Hi Jonathan,

There is currently a few issues with reconstructing rate laws:

  • RateLawEquation in wc-kb and wc-lang do not support observables. Observables here is to represent the sum of multiple ensemble proteins with the same Uniprot Ids
    • A quick alternative is to not use observables but create a new rate equation for each ensemble protein. This will create many rate laws.
  • Per discussion a while ago, we are going to have a rate law for each isoenzyme. This itself will create many rate laws. If we implement this and 1a above, there will be many rate laws for each reaction. Is this a good implementation?
  • The rate law has substrates/products in the expression. Ideally, we want to map the compounds in the expression to the substrates/products in the metabolic reaction. However, because the reactions in Sabio-RK is sometimes generic, we also assign rate laws if they share the same ec numbers. The issue with this now is that the compound in the expression is not mappable to our metabolic reaction.

Some possible quick alternatives:

  • Make RateLawEquation support observables. Perhaps that can be brought up for discussion in the simulation meeting later, if you don’t mind me gate-crashing the meeting for a while?
  • Only record kcat and all the Ks as parameters. Since FBA only cares about the bounds and we only use kcat, we do not really need rate law equation for now in the simulation.

Thanks,
Yin Hoon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant