Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support SU(2) benchmarking #1006

Open
dowusu-antwi opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1017
Open

Support SU(2) benchmarking #1006

dowusu-antwi opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1017
Assignees
@cdbf1
Labels
area/feature-request enhancement New feature or request feature-request supermarq

Comments

@dowusu-antwi
Copy link
Contributor

What is happening?

Add SU(2) benchmarking to Superstaq/Supermarq QCVVB tools. E.g., see Fig. 2 in Lukin paper here:
image

What are the current alternatives?

N/A. Should be facilitated by #992.

Any additional context?

SU(2) is particularly well-suited to neutral atom devices. Adding this supports "write-once, target-any".
@dowusu-antwi dowusu-antwi changed the title Support $SU(2)$ benchmarking Support SU(2) benchmarking Jul 30, 2024
@cdbf1 cdbf1 self-assigned this Aug 7, 2024
@cdbf1 cdbf1 linked a pull request Aug 8, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
@cdbf1
Copy link
Contributor

cdbf1 commented Aug 8, 2024

I took a look at this and I don't think the experiment in Fig 6 of that paper is quite what we want for a general fidelity characterization protocol, so instead I've implemented the protocol they have in Fig 3 which seems to work quite nicely.

We could separately look into what they do in Fig 6 as a method for characterizing phase errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cdbf1 cdbf1

Labels
area/feature-request enhancement New feature or request feature-request supermarq
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

SU2 benchmarking Infleqtion/client-superstaq
2 participants
@dowusu-antwi @cdbf1