Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fetchMinRewardBlocks fails when reward_min_blocks is 0 #177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

andreabadesso
Copy link
Collaborator

@andreabadesso andreabadesso commented Jun 14, 2024

Motivation

fetchMinRewardBlocks is throwing an error when reward_min_blocks is 0 on the fullnode

Acceptance Criteria

  • fetchMinRewardBlocks should not throw when the reward_min_blocks returned by the fullnode is 0

Checklist

  • If you are requesting a merge into master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged
  • Make sure either the unit tests and/or the QA tests are capable of testing the new features
  • Make sure you do not include new dependencies in the project unless strictly necessary and do not include dev-dependencies as production ones. More dependencies increase the possibility of one of them being hijacked and affecting us.

@andreabadesso andreabadesso self-assigned this Jun 14, 2024
@andreabadesso andreabadesso requested review from luislhl and glevco June 14, 2024 15:08
@andreabadesso andreabadesso added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 14, 2024
@andreabadesso andreabadesso merged commit 4a8c1a1 into master Jun 25, 2024
1 check passed
@andreabadesso andreabadesso mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2024
2 tasks
andreabadesso added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
* chore: deploy Nano Testnet (#168)

* fix: fetchMinRewardBlocks fails when reward_min_blocks is 0 (#177)

* fix: handle tx with no inputs and outputs (#178)

* chore: added NODE_ENV to integration tests

* fix: stop failing when there are no address balance on a transaction

* tests: added tests for the voidTransaction method

* chore: re-add test_images_down

* feat: allow sending alerts to another account (#179)

* fix: handle tx with no inputs (#181)

* tests: added tests for the voidTransaction method

* chore: re-add test_images_down

* fix: markUtxosAsVoided should not throw when inputs are empty

* fix: returning empty object on db utils and added test for services including db

* tests: fix invalid order of calls

* tests: missing tests [part 1/2] (#183)

* tests: added missing tests

* tests: added missing tests for nft push

* chore: added docker-compose to flake

* tests: ts-ignore -> ts-expect-error

* feat: handling the vertex_removed event (#182)

* feat: handling the vertex_removed event

* fix: handling empty arrays on IN conditions

* feat: handling VERTEX_REMOVED event

* tests: fix last event

* feat: voiding and removing transaction on vertex_removed event

* tests: added tests for empty array errors

* chore: using port 8085

* chore: actually using 8085

* refactor: removed misleading comment

* ci: support sub-accounts (#184)

* fix: non-standard scripts (#185)

* fix: handling utxos with empty scripts being spent

* refactor: helper to roll until an event

* chore: using latest :stable on custom and empty script docker compose

* refactor: removed unused logs

* chore: using fixed dependencies for all projects (#186)

* fix: updated balances and network name (#196)

* fix: updated throttling lib causing deploy to fail (#195)

* fix: updated firebase-admin lib version and deprecated sendMulticast (#194)

* fix: updated firebase-admin lib version and deprecated sendMulticast

* fix: tests mocking sendMulticast instead of the correct method

* fix: slow address generation (#199)

* chore: bumped to v1.6.3 (#200)

---------

Co-authored-by: Luis Helder <[email protected]>
@andreabadesso andreabadesso mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants