Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Skip" on judging interface is ambiguous #66

Open
arpieb opened this issue Oct 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

"Skip" on judging interface is ambiguous #66

arpieb opened this issue Oct 22, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arpieb
Copy link

arpieb commented Oct 22, 2018

First off, I had a blast judging @ HackGT 5, thanks for inviting me! One thing that a few of us judges were discussing was the "skip" option when checking in at a project table. During orientation, it was said to use that option if nobody was at the table to give us a new project to judge. However, there were many times when a project was already in demo for either another judge or other students that it would have been nice to "skip" to another project instead of waiting - but nobody wanted to risk flagging a project as not being present by hitting "skip" since we weren't sure what the effect would be.

That being said, maybe a better explanation of the impact on "skipping" a project (and maybe a reminder onscreen like the great voting prompts re scale points), or an additional option for passing over a project that was represented but already engaged?

@NameThatFollows NameThatFollows added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants