You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hacks are awarded points for how they placed, 1 3 points for 1st place, 2 for 2nd, 3 1 for 3rd. The hack with the fewest most points is highest placed.
Superlatives are awarded to the hack with the with the most nominations for a category. A hack can not win more than 1 superlative; a team with multiple most-nominations for a superlative wins the superlative which they received the greater number of nominations for. Any other superlatives which the hack has the most nominations for will run-off to the next most-nominated hack.
We need a method of resolving ties between the following scenarios:
Equal score between hacks within the top-three
Equal number of superlative nominations between hacks
Equal number of superlative nominations for a hack between superlatives
Possible resolutions are:
Random number generator
Designated tie-breaking individual.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need a concise way to view judging results.
Here's our criteria copied and modified from #39:
We need a method of resolving ties between the following scenarios:
Possible resolutions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: