Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing unit tests #3745

Closed
diegomarquezp opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3747
Closed

Failing unit tests #3745

diegomarquezp opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3747

Comments

@diegomarquezp
Copy link
Contributor

diegomarquezp commented Feb 13, 2024

Tests run: 7, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.087 s <<< FAILURE! - in com.google.cloud.tools.eclipse.appengine.libraries.model.CloudLibrariesInPluginXmlTest
testObjectifyLibraryConfig(com.google.cloud.tools.eclipse.appengine.libraries.model.CloudLibrariesInPluginXmlTest)  Time elapsed: 0.001 s  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6.0.9> but was:<6.1.1>
	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:144)
	at Tests run: 7, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.087 s <<< FAILURE! - in com.google.cloud.tools.eclipse.appengine.libraries.model.CloudLibrariesInPluginXmlTest
testObjectifyLibraryConfig(com.google.cloud.tools.eclipse.appengine.libraries.model.CloudLibrariesInPluginXmlTest)  Time elapsed: 0.001 s  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<6.0.9> but was:<6.1.1>
	at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
	at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
	at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:144)
	at 

Originally posted by @diegomarquezp in #3744 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant