You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We'd like to follow up on this issue, where we defined the ideal situation - using BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE the same size as the sync batch. We use SYNC_BATCH_SIZE and then SYNC_BATCH_SMALL_SIZE for the sandblasting period, so the BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE should reflect this.
Currently, we only raised the BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE to 1000, which brings great sync machine speed up (about 50%) and still works well for the sandblasting period.
Describe the solution you'd like
Alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We'd like to follow up on this issue, where we defined the ideal situation - using
BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE
the same size as the sync batch. We useSYNC_BATCH_SIZE
and thenSYNC_BATCH_SMALL_SIZE
for the sandblasting period, so theBLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE
should reflect this.Currently, we only raised the
BLOCKS_METADATA_BUFFER_SIZE
to 1000, which brings great sync machine speed up (about 50%) and still works well for the sandblasting period.Describe the solution you'd like
Alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: