You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wanted to use this pipeline to analyze ultra-low-input, native ChIP-Seq samples ULI-NChIP looking at histone modifications.
Unlike regular ChIP-Seq, ULI-NChIP uses MNase for digestion (instead of sonication) and avoids cross-linking protein-DNA interactions.
Considering that the histone pipeline would expect the standard histone ChIP-Seq, would there be a problem using this pipeline?
Furthermore, MNase is known to have it's own biases and so I wonder....
Whether the normal ChIP-Seq library complexity QC parameters are still valid to exclude samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @akundaje and @leepc12 ,
I wanted to use this pipeline to analyze ultra-low-input, native ChIP-Seq samples ULI-NChIP looking at histone modifications.
Unlike regular ChIP-Seq, ULI-NChIP uses MNase for digestion (instead of sonication) and avoids cross-linking protein-DNA interactions.
Considering that the histone pipeline would expect the standard histone ChIP-Seq, would there be a problem using this pipeline?
Furthermore, MNase is known to have it's own biases and so I wonder....
Whether the normal ChIP-Seq library complexity QC parameters are still valid to exclude samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: