Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I2C: tighten up the between byte timing by using non blocking functions #150

Open
DangerousPrototypes opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DangerousPrototypes
Copy link
Owner

Currently I2C is leaning heavily on the sm_wait_idle function to make sure things happen in the proper order. This should be changed:

  • At the syntax level: non-mode commands should use the wait_idle of the active mode before proceding
  • At the mode level: use non blocking functions, use wait idle only where needed (eg SPI CS)
  • For demos: ensure demos are adjusted to use the correct blocking or non-blocking functions
@DangerousPrototypes DangerousPrototypes added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant