Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Team 3: What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage? #28

Open
alne4294 opened this issue Sep 30, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@alne4294
Copy link

No description provided.

@alne4294 alne4294 changed the title What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage? Sep 30, 2014
@alne4294 alne4294 changed the title What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage? Team 3: What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage? Sep 30, 2014
@BrianNewsom
Copy link

Option 1: There is a major correlation

This suggests that a larger animal is more likely to cause serious damage to a plane. More caution should be taken in areas in which large birds fly commonly.

Option 2: There is no correlation

This suggests size is insignificant compared to speed when an animal is hit in the air. Birds in general are a risk and caution should be taken in any location.

@alne4294 alne4294 reopened this Sep 30, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants