You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Team 3: What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage?
#28
Open
alne4294 opened this issue
Sep 30, 2014
· 1 comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alne4294
changed the title
What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages?
What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage?
Sep 30, 2014
alne4294
changed the title
What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage?
Team 3: What is the relationship between wildlife size and cost of damages? Is if there is not a positive correlation, what other factors may generally impact the cost of damage?
Sep 30, 2014
This suggests that a larger animal is more likely to cause serious damage to a plane. More caution should be taken in areas in which large birds fly commonly.
Option 2: There is no correlation
This suggests size is insignificant compared to speed when an animal is hit in the air. Birds in general are a risk and caution should be taken in any location.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: