Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
The attached sample shows how we are doing in-network-rates with external provider-reference files. It has passed validation. Input JSON is valid. Hope that helps/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the below In-Network-Rates-Multiple-Plan JSON file data, can you please advise the correct way to represent the provider_references to include the provider_group_id and location, so as to pass the Schema validation. We will be using using an external file for the Provider Groups(Provider Reference).
{"reporting_entity_name":"CMS","reporting_entity_type":"CMS","last_updated_on":"2022-05-12","version":"1.0.0","in_network":[{"negotiation_arrangement":"ffs","name":"ABC AGE >17 W CC","billing_code_type":"MS-DRG","billing_code_type_version":"2020","billing_code":"001","description":"ABC AGE >17 W CC","negotiated_rates":[{"provider_references":[1],"negotiated_prices":[{"negotiated_type":"negotiated","negotiated_rate":624.1403,"expiration_date":"2078-12-31T00:00:00","billing_class":"institutional"},{"negotiated_type":"negotiated","negotiated_rate":320.5271,"expiration_date":"2078-12-31T00:00:00","billing_class":"institutional"}]}]}]}
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions