Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt CMDI profile to add extra fields to categorize the vocabularies with additional options for the users #2

Closed
lilimelgar opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
FAIR vocabularies to use in HuC kanban board

Comments

@lilimelgar
Copy link
Contributor

In order to search and present the vocabularies with useful metadata, we suggest to add these new fields to the vocabulary metadata (in the editor): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GzK0bd_-1-oyfmHZO2t7F7k2po9EO8rs/edit?gid=1344450306#gid=1344450306. Together with menzowindhouwer we follow the steps needed to configure these fields in the CMDI editor.

Note: This issue was originally created in the structured data team repository on July16, 2024:
https://github.com/knaw-huc/team-structured-data-backlog/issues/4#issue-2410737588

@lilimelgar lilimelgar self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@kerim1
Copy link

kerim1 commented Oct 23, 2024

We changed the profile: now it has to be updated in the editor.
For @kerim1 to reformat the current cmdi records which can then be loaded into the editor.

@lilimelgar
Copy link
Contributor Author

We added important properties to capture information that will provide better access points for searching and browsing: topics (nwo research fields, unesco thesaurus, keyword), language, mentions of responsibility (creator, maintainer, contributor). The latest version including this properties is this one: ed684dc.
We close this issue for now, more properties may be added later after first user tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FAIR vocabularies to use in HuC kanban board
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants