Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Backslashes need to be escaped in chat commands #1822

Open
fineless71 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[BUG] Backslashes need to be escaped in chat commands #1822

fineless71 opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working 👷 development build development build issue 🌑 nextgen

Comments

@fineless71
Copy link
Contributor

fineless71 commented Jan 18, 2024

LiquidBounce Branch

Nextgen

LiquidBounce Build/Version

017b06c

Operating System

Linux

Minecraft Version

1.20.4

Describe the bug

Backslashes need to be escaped in chat commands and are seemingly ignored unless there are two of them.

Steps to reproduce

For example, do .chat An\ Example, and it only shows An Example.
Something like .t \S\p\e\e\d\ will enable speed.
To make backslashes work, you need two of them like .chat \\, which will only show one.

Client Log

Nothing relevent

Screenshots

No response

@github-actions github-actions bot added 🌑 nextgen 🐛 bug Something isn't working 👷 development build development build issue labels Jan 18, 2024
@Razzy52
Copy link
Contributor

Razzy52 commented Jan 18, 2024

what's the point of needing to use backslashes in a command?

@fineless71
Copy link
Contributor Author

fineless71 commented Jan 18, 2024

what's the point of needing to use backslashes in a command?

Well mostly for .chat, I think there should be a backslash when I type one :)

Maybe I'm explaining to someone how to escape strings in scripts for example

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working 👷 development build development build issue 🌑 nextgen
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants