Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need a way to specify container volume #26

Open
bbartley opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Need a way to specify container volume #26

bbartley opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@bbartley
Copy link
Collaborator

I was perusing the properties in Protege and I couldn't find anything like a hasVolume property (although, it seems like I remember seeing a wellVolume property at some point). A hasVolume property would be generally useful, as many container types come in different volumes (e.g., standard sizes for microfuge tubes are 0.5, 1.5, 2.0 mL, standard sizes for conical tubes are 15 mL and 50 mL). So this property will probably come in handy for more precisely specifying common containers.

@rpgoldman
Copy link
Collaborator

You are right, for microplates there is only a wellVolume property because of the ambiguity of using hasVolume for a multi-well plate: total volume or single well volume? And so far, I really only have microplates.

If you have an example of some containers that are not microplates, that would help me make the extension, and would generally improve the ontology.

If you have pointers to data sheets or other specs, that would be really great. I will try to translate anything you can give me.

@photocyte
Copy link
Member

If you have an example of some containers that are not microplates, that would help me make the extension, and would generally improve the ontology.

If you have pointers to data sheets or other specs, that would be really great. I will try to translate anything you can give me.

Hi there, a quick overview of the most commonly used tubes/vials in bioscience relevant to automation can be seen here:
https://shop.opentrons.com/consumables/

(Other automation vendors might have similar "shortened lists" of automation relevant containers). Definitely the "space" to classify all non-microplate containers into a sensible ontology, might be a bit unexplored. Such non-microplate containers often aren't even mentioned explicitly in biological protocols - as there is just an assumption that people will use whatever 10-100 mL esq container that they might have lying around.

Usually, for these types of containers, there aren't technical data sheets like microplates might have. For something like an Opentrons OT2 instrument, the containers fit into these fairly large holders:
https://shop.opentrons.com/4-in-1-tube-rack-set/
https://shop.opentrons.com/aluminum-block-set/

And since the mechanical tolerances / where the pipette needs to be is pretty forgiving, not much in way of data sheets or precise calibration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants