You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 17, 2025. It is now read-only.
On a discussion with IamActuallyLvL1 on Twitter came up the idea that we should modify the standings properties so it's reordered according to the Top 8, much like what's done with the decks themselves.
Since this would not require re-downloading it seems like a fairly simple fix, but there's a few more things to consider:
Should we modify the points property based on the brackets adding +3 per win if those are already not included? Or just leave that as the swiss result?
Should we adjust the tiebreakers based on the brackets as well?
Should we modify the original standings, or preserve it and have a separate "normalized standings" property?
Overall I think the most important thing here would be ensure that this behavior is consistent among all data sources.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
On a discussion with IamActuallyLvL1 on Twitter came up the idea that we should modify the standings properties so it's reordered according to the Top 8, much like what's done with the decks themselves.
Since this would not require re-downloading it seems like a fairly simple fix, but there's a few more things to consider:
Overall I think the most important thing here would be ensure that this behavior is consistent among all data sources.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: