Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rhino_Toolkit: Converts for surfaces #39

Open
IsakNaslundBh opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Rhino_Toolkit: Converts for surfaces #39

IsakNaslundBh opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers severity:medium Slows progress, but workaround is possible type:feature New capability or enhancement type:question Ask for further details or start conversation

Comments

@IsakNaslundBh
Copy link
Contributor

IsakNaslundBh commented Apr 26, 2018

Noticing during testing that the convers for surfaces does not seem to be giving the various sub type when converted into BHoM.

For example, it seems impossible to get Lofts, extrusions and Pipes to come through into BHoM. Even if specific components targeting these have been used so generate the surfaces, they all come in as Nurbs. If extra checks would be possible before converting, as for the curves, I think that that would be good.

@epignatelli epignatelli added this to the BHoM 2.2 MVP milestone Jan 4, 2019
@al-fisher al-fisher added severity:medium Slows progress, but workaround is possible type:feature New capability or enhancement and removed feature labels Mar 20, 2019
@epignatelli epignatelli added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 26, 2019
@al-fisher
Copy link
Member

Reinserting @IsakNaslundBh original comments from Archive to help reassess relevance/address this issue:

Noticing during testing that the convers for surfaces does not seem to be giving the various sub type when converted into BHoM.

For example, it seems impossible to get Lofts, extrusions and Pipes to come through into BHoM. Even if specific components targeting these have been used so generate the surfaces, they all come in as Nurbs. If extra checks would be possible before converting, as for the curves, I think that that would be good.

@al-fisher al-fisher added the type:question Ask for further details or start conversation label Apr 14, 2019
@epignatelli epignatelli removed this from the BHoM 2.2 MVP milestone Oct 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers severity:medium Slows progress, but workaround is possible type:feature New capability or enhancement type:question Ask for further details or start conversation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants