You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently if a Rhino surface does not have trims, it is being converted accordingly. However, that seems to cause issues further down the line, in software packages that require defining trims (e.g. Revit). Theoretically it should be possible to extract the outer bounds of an untrimmed surface from its definition, but we do not have a method for it I am afraid (and it might be tricky to write one). Therefore, it would be easier to simply convert the untrimmed Rhino surface into a BRep before converting to BHoM, but that will lead to mismatch between input and output.
I am wondering what would be the best way to tackle this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently if a Rhino surface does not have trims, it is being converted accordingly. However, that seems to cause issues further down the line, in software packages that require defining trims (e.g. Revit). Theoretically it should be possible to extract the outer bounds of an untrimmed surface from its definition, but we do not have a method for it I am afraid (and it might be tricky to write one). Therefore, it would be easier to simply convert the untrimmed Rhino surface into a BRep before converting to BHoM, but that will lead to mismatch between input and output.
I am wondering what would be the best way to tackle this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: