-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for pikaur #275
Comments
Hi, Thanks a lot for the feature request!
This is a fair point! However...
...it's definitely not feasible to support every AUR helpers / pacman wrapper there is. 😅
It's indeed important that they share options with pacman itself (to ease their support integration within Luckily, it seems like I have a lot to do in the incoming days / weeks, so I can't promise I'll be able to do that soon, but I'll try my best! |
Turns out I got time to make a few quick tests today and adding support for I'm starting to work on this. |
Add support for the [pikaur](https://github.com/actionless/pikaur) AUR helper (in additon of `paru` and `yay`) for AUR packages support. Closes #275
Support for |
Description
Support for pikaur as an additional aur pacman wrapper.
Motivation and context
AUR wrappers show diffs to the last installed version of the installation scripts when installing a new version. This is critical for security. When arch-update uses a different package manager than what the user uses otherwise, these updates becomes misaligned. I don't know if it is feasible to just support all wrappers that there are, but I for one use pikaur and hope that it could be added as a supported wrapper. I guess, that if they're compatible with pacman, adding them should be relatively easy.
Maybe a more generic option could also be viable. Like setting a path to a wrapper in the config file instead of naming the wrapper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: