[Feature request] Make it more powerful

[BachiMjavanadze]

I have been looking for a normal extension for the terminal for a long time but did not find it. Script Runner suits my needs more or less. I wrote to the author what needs to be corrected and added, but he does not answer. Can you please look at my feature requests and add them to your extension?

Here is my settings (in settings.json) for the Script Runner (I'm on Windows, commands are for cmd or powershell):

"script-runner.statusBar": true, "script-runner.definitions": { "variables": { "$path": "D:\\Documents\\Development", }, "commands": [ { "identifier": "Angular 1", "description": "Angular - create project + ESlint + CSS", "command": "ng new $var1 --style=css --routing=false; cd $var1; ng add @angular-eslint/schematics --skip-confirmation=true; ng lint; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] }, { "identifier": "Angular 2", "description": "Angular - create project + ESlint + CSS + Routing", "command": "ng new $var1 --style=css --routing=true; cd $var1; ng add @angular-eslint/schematics --skip-confirmation=true; ng lint; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] }, { "identifier": "Angular 3", "description": "Angular - create project + ESlint + SCSS", "command": "ng new $var1 --style=scss --routing=false; cd $var1; ng add @angular-eslint/schematics --skip-confirmation=true; ng lint; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] }, { "identifier": "Angular 4", "description": "Angular - create project + ESlint + SCSS + Routing", "command": "ng new $var1 --style=scss --routing=true; cd $var1; ng add @angular-eslint/schematics --skip-confirmation=true; ng lint; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] }, { "identifier": "Angular 5", "description": "Angular - create project (interactive mode)", "command": "ng new $var1 --style=$var2 --routing=$var3; cd $var1; ng add @angular-eslint/schematics --skip-confirmation=true; ng lint; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" }, { "variable": "$var2", "question": "CSS or SCSS?", "options": [ "css", "scss" ] }, { "variable": "$var3", "question": "Install roating?", "options": [ "true", "false" ] } ] }, { "identifier": "C# - console", "description": "C# - create new console project", "command": "dotnet new console -o $var1; cd $var1; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] }, { "identifier": "C# - asp.net", "description": "C# - create new asp.net", "command": "dotnet new web -o $var1; cd $var1; code -r .", "working_directory": "$path", "form": [ { "variable": "$var1", "question": "Project name" } ] } ] },

[Angelmaneuver]

Hi BachiMjavanadze.
I'll answer for your feature request.

In conclusion, your feature request is rejected.
The reason is that it takes time and effort, but I do not feel attractive.

1. [Feature request] Group commands #15
   I believe this functionality requirement can be met by creating a folder and creating commands under it.

2. [Feature request] Contex menu commands #16
   I think the request is to switch the content of the command for each folder path, but if the project changes, the folder structure will also change.
   Also, I think there is a pattern where the folder path is the same but the language is different.
   Frankly, it's a pain to think about.
   I think it would be easier to create a folder for each category and have a set of commands.

3. [Feature request] Form options object #17
   I did not understand the content of the request, but it seems that vscode-script-runner can dynamically assembule command contents in an interactive manner, so I guess it is a request related to that.
   This extension does not have that feature.
   This extension can be configured to just paste the command into the terminal instead of executing it on a command-by-command basis.
   If necessary, you can edit and run the command pasted into the terminal.
   Frankly, it is lame, but I don't think it is much of a problem for practical use.

We apologize for not meeting your expectations.

Thanks for reporting the issue.
If there are no additional questions, I'll close this issue in about week.

[BachiMjavanadze]

No more questions. Close it