Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[PE-D][Tester A] Module code format a bit unclear #139

Closed
soc-se-bot opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #165
Closed

[PE-D][Tester A] Module code format a bit unclear #139

soc-se-bot opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #165
Assignees
@cjyothika
Labels
severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. type.UGUPdate Need to change UG to reflect application constraints

Comments

@soc-se-bot
Copy link

In UG, the description of add comment is:

image.png

And I noticed in the FAQ you mentioned about "correct format".

image.png

However, I didn't find in the UG what is the format of the module code accepted.

I keyed in CSS2101 it passed but CSSSS2101 it failed.

image.png

Maybe you can consider to state what format is accepted for module code in the UG!

Labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.Medium
original: DerrickSaltFish/ped#3
@cjyothika
Copy link

This is similar to #130 and #131. Perhaps also mention in the ug that only nus module codes are valid? Although this is implied since the app is only meant for nus modules.

@cjyothika cjyothika self-assigned this Apr 1, 2023
@cjyothika cjyothika mentioned this issue Apr 1, 2023
Merged
@cjyothika cjyothika linked a pull request Apr 1, 2023 that will close this issue
Fix missing /t and invalid module code error message #165
Merged
@cjyothika cjyothika added severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. type.UGUPdate Need to change UG to reflect application constraints labels Apr 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cjyothika cjyothika

Labels
severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. type.UGUPdate Need to change UG to reflect application constraints
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix missing /t and invalid module code error message cjyothika/tp
2 participants
@cjyothika @soc-se-bot