You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the APP4 mappings both psiu and tx_trans are applied to calculate msftbarot (ocean_barotropic_mass_streamfunction)
using this function:
def msftbarot(psiu,tx_trans):
drake_trans=transAcrossLine(tx_trans,212,212,32,49)
#loop over times
for i,trans in enumerate(drake_trans):
#offset psiu by the drake passage transport at that time
psiu[i,:]=psiu[i,:]+trans
return psiu
In theory psiu and msfbarot are equivalent and just using psiu should be sufficient, provided psiu is calculated correctly by the model. Does anyone know if the issue with the way the model calculate psiu is still current for the OM2 and CM2 more recent model runs?
According to the APP4 mappings both psiu and tx_trans are applied to calculate msftbarot (ocean_barotropic_mass_streamfunction)
using this function:
def msftbarot(psiu,tx_trans):
drake_trans=transAcrossLine(tx_trans,212,212,32,49)
#loop over times
for i,trans in enumerate(drake_trans):
#offset psiu by the drake passage transport at that time
psiu[i,:]=psiu[i,:]+trans
return psiu
In theory psiu and msfbarot are equivalent and just using psiu should be sufficient, provided psiu is calculated correctly by the model. Does anyone know if the issue with the way the model calculate psiu is still current for the OM2 and CM2 more recent model runs?
@taimoorsohail @aekiss @rmholmes tagging you just in case you might have an answer, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: