Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 23, 2019. It is now read-only.

Don't actually delete anything? #112

Open
timothyhollabaugh opened this issue Sep 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Don't actually delete anything? #112

timothyhollabaugh opened this issue Sep 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
priority-low Not required, but would make someone's lives easier question Needs some fleshing out scope-medium A change that requires a bit of work, but does not significantly change the archecture

Comments

@timothyhollabaugh
Copy link
Member

So that we don't perminantly loose data, would it make sense to never delete anything, but instead mark it as deleted in some way that hides it from the users? Maybe by removing all permissions for it.
@timothyhollabaugh timothyhollabaugh added priority-low Not required, but would make someone's lives easier question Needs some fleshing out labels Sep 14, 2019
@timothyhollabaugh
Copy link
Member Author

More generally, we could use Persistent data structures. They would make sure nothing is ever lost. Idk how that works with sql though.

@timothyhollabaugh timothyhollabaugh added the scope-medium A change that requires a bit of work, but does not significantly change the archecture label Sep 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority-low Not required, but would make someone's lives easier question Needs some fleshing out scope-medium A change that requires a bit of work, but does not significantly change the archecture
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@timothyhollabaugh