Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relevant specifications for 5GMS AF #1

Open
dsilhavy opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Relevant specifications for 5GMS AF #1

dsilhavy opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@dsilhavy
Copy link
Contributor

dsilhavy commented Sep 1, 2022

5G Core

5G Media Streaming

@rjb1000
Copy link
Contributor

rjb1000 commented Sep 5, 2022

Note that new versions of the 5G Media Streaming specifications will be published shortly after SA#97, which ends on 16th September. In particular, a number of corrections to the OpenAPI definitions have been made in TS 26.512 annex C, so this version would be a sensible baseline starting point.

@rjb1000
Copy link
Contributor

rjb1000 commented Sep 5, 2022

We may also consider Release 16 specifications as a point of departure. Release 16 specifies a subset of 5G Media Streaming features that fully satisfies the scope of MVP#1 and MVP#2. The corrections to TS 26.512 annex C relevant to Release 16 will also be published following SA#97, so again this version would be a sensible baseline starting point.

@rjb1000 rjb1000 changed the title Relevant specifications Relevant specifications for 5GMS AF Sep 20, 2022
@rjb1000 rjb1000 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 22, 2022
@rjb1000 rjb1000 added this to the Milestone 1 - Planning phase milestone Sep 22, 2022
@jordijoangimenez
Copy link
Contributor

I'm confused. I think 23.501 should be related to 5G Core and 26.501 be 5GMS above. And NRF should be NEF (when not trusted by the operator)?
I've tried to go step by step here: Link
We can grow it from there.

@rjb1000
Copy link
Contributor

rjb1000 commented Oct 6, 2022

Good spot, @jordijoangimenez. TS 23.501 and TS 26.501 were the wrong way round above. I have fixed.

@jordijoangimenez
Copy link
Contributor

We need to shift the clauses too. I'll fix.
Would e.g. clause 11 be something to be looked from an MSH point of view or from AF?
MSH will use what's described in clause 11 to access resources exposed by AF. I would cover the MSH API under the "Relevant specifications for 5GMS MSH"... but no strong view if we want to have the link here too

@rjb1000
Copy link
Contributor

rjb1000 commented Oct 6, 2022

You're right that the 5GMS AF needs to implement Service Access Information, so yes: TS 26.512 clause 11 is relevant.

jordijoangimenez added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
davidjwbbc pushed a commit to davidjwbbc/rt-5gms-application-function that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2023
…-provisioning

Fix compilation issues and tidy code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants